OPINION | This article contains the author's opinion.
Popular liberal scientist and pseudo-intellectual Neil deGrasse Tyson struggled to understand why millions of Americans oppose biological males competing in women’s sports.
Tyson dismissed conservatives as being “completely ridiculous.” Tyson argued that people can have “the gender of our choice.”
“The XX, XY chromosomes are insufficient,” the scientist bizarrely stated. “Because when we wake up in the morning, we exaggerate whatever feature we want to portray the gender of our choice.” (Trending: Democrat Abruptly Leaves Party, Joins GOP)
Neil deGrasse Tyson, a scientist who doesn't know the difference between a man and a woman.
Will someone please help him out in the comments below?pic.twitter.com/ZiyqZ281zf
— TaraBull (@TaraBull808) September 24, 2023
“Suppose no matter my chromosomes today, I feel 80% female, 20% male. Now I’m going to I’m going to put on makeup,” he continued.
“Tomorrow. I might feel 80% male; I’ll remove the makeup, and I’ll wear a muscle shirt… What business is it of yours to require that I fulfill your inability to think of gender on a spectrum,” Tyson said.
“It is a little weird that we split people by male and female in this way. I’m imagining a hundred years from now looking back and saying, ‘Do you know back 100 years ago, they split boys and girls, and they couldn’t compete?’ And … that’d just be kind of a little weird,” he said. (Trending: Illegal Alien Arrested For Disturbing Crime After Biden Release)
“What the trans conversation is foisting upon us is the need to find ways to slice the athletic universe such that we still have interesting, fair matches,” Tyson said. “And is it a combination of did you go through puberty as a male and then transition? Did you have puberty blockers? What is your hormone level now… if you want to compete?”
“So it requires more creative thought rather than saying no to at all,” he added. “It’s an unsolved problem. Yes, but it’s not unsolvable, given what we know about human physiology. So why not rise to that occasion and solve it rather than take your older view of the world and force modern emergent conduct of people to fit that?”
Co-host Konstantin Kisin correctly challenged by Tyson by saying, “Well, hold on a second. The difference is the difference is physiologically between men and women is not just hormonal. Women have a different hip angle. They have different heart capacities. They have different lung capacity. I mean, there are profound physiological differences, different bone density,” Kisin said.
Tyson said, “So, for example, I wrestled in my life. I was captain of my high school wrestling team. It would be unfair for me at 190 pounds, which is what I was back then, to wrestle someone 120 pounds.”
Kisin said, “Hold on. It would actually be unfair for you to wrestle a woman who is also 190 pounds.”
“We’re in a transitional period. So we have to figure that out. But the way to figure out things that require solutions to progressive change is not to regress it to how things once were. If that were the case, I would still be drinking from a segregated water fountain,” Tyson said.
Kisin said, “I think a lot of people would have an issue with what you’re saying now because they see women being denied opportunities, they see an unfair playing field, metaphorically and literally speaking.”
Tyson replied with, “So fix the playing field, damn it!”
“Well, don’t say it’s an unfair playing field, so all of a sudden, the big issue is trans women taking the slot of a woman in an unfair playing field,” Tyson argued. “Fix the playing field! And you know something? The day you fix that playing field, this conversation will look completely ridiculous. That’s what I’m trying to tell you.”
Most Popular:
Liberals Furious Over White Woman Winning Miss Zimbabwe
Democrats Regret Sanctuary Cities